Understanding the Misconception of Investment Performance in Down Markets

A prevalent misunderstanding occurs when an investment or strategy shows favorable performance in a year characterized by general market declines. Often, advisors quickly infer that these investments serve as reliable safeguards against bear markets. However, this assumption can be deceptive. The fact that an investment fares well during a down year does not automatically indicate that it acts as a protective measure against market downturns.

What matters the most for investment success? You may be surprised by the answer.

In a world wired for immediate responses, the disciplined practice of patience becomes a rare commodity—and yet, it remains the most critical component of successful long-term investment strategies. As advisors, let's lead by example, demonstrating a steadfast commitment to well-laid plans and the foresight to look beyond the emotional impulses of the moment. This is how we truly serve the best interests of our clients, ensuring their financial journey is marked by informed decisions rather than emotional reactions.

The Prudent Path: Should Investment Advisors Utilize Stock or ETF Models?

Investment advisors must give careful thought to the matters of asset allocation and investment vehicles. It is important to take a step back and consider the wider picture, especially when it comes to aligning investment strategies with their clients' comfort levels and their own areas of expertise and trading experience, despite the attraction of large potential returns for individual stock models.

The Pitfalls of Portfolio Pivots: Are your investment portfolios the same as what you started the year with?

When you feel pressured by outside forces or the need to adjust your investment portfolios quickly in response to every market blip, it's simple to get caught up in this trap. Still, we should ask ourselves if our investment portfolios now match what they were at the beginning of the year. If not, it might be time to give patience another thought.

Why Backtesting Holds the Edge Over Real-Life Performance in Non-Quantitative Investments

Numbers hold sway in portfolio management, where performance metrics, especially historical ones, often dictate decisions. Yet, the reliability of real-world performance, especially in non-quantitative investments, is a question mark. Enter backtesting, a strategy simulation that shines in several ways. It provides a consistent data set, neutralizing external influences, unlike real-life numbers prone to fluctuations. Plus, with frequent fund manager changes, assessing real-life numbers can be tricky, but backtesting evaluates the strategy, not the manager. It lets you model diverse scenarios, stress-test strategies, and removes emotional biases.

Attractive Investment Risk Measurements versus Short-Term Volatility

Investment risk measurements such as down-market beta, downside capture ratio, and down-market correlation are attractive because they suggest that an investment is less likely to experience large losses in a bear market. However, it is important to note that these measurements are typically calculated over longer timeframes with higher datapoints. This means that they may not be as accurate in predicting short-term volatility.

Harnessing Momentum: The Perks and Snags of a Relative Strength Approach to Portfolio Selection

The relative strength approach to portfolio selection, rooted in momentum investing, is gaining traction among investment advisors for its potential to improve risk-adjusted returns. By comparing portfolio performances, advisors can identify and capitalize on existing momentum, ensuring assets are allocated to portfolios currently outperforming their peers or benchmarks. This strategy responds well to prevailing market trends, promoting better performance and ease of implementation. However, it’s not without downsides like high turnover, which may lead to increased transaction costs and tax implications. The balance of benefits against drawbacks warrants careful consideration in employing this approach.

Navigating Investment Terrain: Why Risk is More Repeatable Than Return

Returns can be deceiving, especially in the short term, as they fluctuate dramatically over different 10-year periods. However, digging deeper reveals that standard deviation, a risk measure, tends to follow a more consistent path, making it a more reliable parameter in evaluating investments. As investment advisors, directing clients toward this stable metric rather than the fluctuating returns can foster investment strategies based on realistic expectations, laying the groundwork for a smoother, more predictable investment journey.

Understanding the Relationship Between High Interest Rates and Corporate Defaults

Interest rates play an important role in determining a company's economic direction and, by extension, its ability to service debts. As a result, dissecting the complex relationship between high interest rates and corporate defaults is critical. We will delve into the complexities of this relationship in this discussion, shedding light on how rising interest rates can potentially lead to an increase in corporate defaults.

Navigating Bondscapes: Echoes from the '70s that Ring True Today

In the 1970s, 'stagflation' dramatically reshaped investments. Amid economic challenges, bonds, usually seen as stable, faced a severe bear market, largely due to the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. Reflecting on this period provides essential insights, especially when current events, like the 2022 external shocks, resonate with the past.

Diversification in Depth: Reasons a Portfolio Should Hold More Than 30 Stocks

The "Rule of 30" has long been a favorite among investors, implying that holding 30 different stocks can significantly reduce unsystematic risk in a portfolio. Many investment professionals regard this rule as an investment canon, derived from the idea that the benefits of diversification plateau after a certain point. But, with businesses and markets increasingly interconnected on a global scale, we must ask whether the "rule of 30" is still applicable.

Striking the Right Balance: The Pitfalls of Overallocating to Hedge Strategies in Your Portfolio

While investing in hedge strategies as a core component can be a prudent risk management strategy, it is critical to understand the risks of overinvestment. This blog delves into the complexities of allocating to hedge strategies, as well as the importance of setting realistic expectations for yourself and your clients.

The Power of Pre-Built Portfolios: A Time-Saving Solution for Investment Advisors

In this blog, we explore the efficiency and convenience of pre-built portfolios, offering both customization and time savings for investment advisors. Instead of creating custom portfolios for each client, providing a selection of 3-5 pre-built portfolios can streamline the rebalancing process and deliver tangible benefits to advisors and clients alike.

Building a Robust Portfolio: Sector Caps are the Pillars of Diversification!

Diversification, an important investment strategy, manages risk and increases potential returns. Sector caps, which limit exposure to a single industry to balance a portfolio, are critical to this. This blog will discuss the significance of sector caps and their benefits.

Whisking Wealth: Mastering the Recipe of Asset Allocation, Your Investment Cake!

Asset allocation is akin to baking a cake, combining diverse investments like individual ingredients. Just as a cake needs all components, regardless of their individual taste, a portfolio needs all its assets for optimal performance. Evaluating based on individual assets can mislead, as omitting an underperforming investment might negatively impact long-term returns.

Get Started

0%
here
here
here
here
here
Great! Contact us for support.